RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:09:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:58 PM, William W. LeFevre <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Dear All:
>
> Peter is right.  That sometimes adds into the mix as well.  However, some
> of the people on this list can attest to the fact that the turn around time
> has often been pretty quick.
>
> in the past I reviewed applications (in the early 1990s), the more accurate
and detailed the supporting documentation the easier it was to approve the
application. if the supporting documentation was ambigous or unclear we
asked for additional information.

The ICRM has been for years continually improving their processes. to show
my age when I took the exams in the 1980s we used bluebooks to submit our
answers. By the early 1990s we started receiving requests to use computers
for the exams. and now we use a testing service.
-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2