RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:29:23 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
well, I don't remember the words we used, but when I introduced a single
supplier courier service across a large organisation where each division was
largely autonomous, we sold it primarily by pointing to the better prices,
plus that we managed the contract and processed the invoices (even though
the costs went back to each division).
I doubt that will be of advantage to you as hopefully you won't have
disasters each month, but there must be a reason why you went for a single
supplier? economies of scale? simplified contract administration? whatever
the reason, that's what you sell.

And when you begin the procurement exercise is when you involve all the
stakeholders, it's much harder after you've signed the contract.
Cheers

Glenn

Glenn Sanders
[log in to unmask]
Australia

These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2