Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:01:22 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>< ALL records are to be on your retention schedule. Vital Records fit in
that statement.>
>
>I understood the question to be more in line of should those records listed
on the retention schedule that are Vital Records be specifically identified
as such on the schedule.
>
I understood it this was as well Ginny, but would like to offer a couple of
thoughts on the subject.
Most retention schedules, whether they are functional or organizational in
construct break records down into series and then provide a citation and
retention period for that series- seldom do they go down to the level of
naming specific items within a series.
While it is correct to state that all records should be included in a
retention schedule, and also that it is a good practice to identify records
that may be considered vital on that schedule, seldom do ALL records in a
given series qualify as vital to an organization.
It might be possible to state "series includes some vital records" and then
provide a pointer out to an independent list of which records within the
series are vital, or to have an "A, B, C..." listing within a series to
describe each record type (by name) within a series is vital and annotate is
as such, but unless this is a limited number of records, it seems like a lot
of extra work to maintain.
Larry
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|