Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:06:38 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Larry wrote:
Snip: <If during an audit or other action
records are requested that have met their assigned/regulated required
retention, you are not expected to produce them... and if you do, it could
call into question the application of your retention schedule on other records.>
I think you make some great points, as usual. I think the potentially
challenging aspect in this particular area is that I have heard that there's no
statute of limitation for audits in this area. So a company can't fall back on a
suggested/required retention as a defense as is the case with other agencies
such as the IRS. The issue then, as you stated, could be seen as a risk
assessment (involving lots of departments). A company would have to balance
the potential cost and risk of retaining information longer against the potential
cost due to the state because of the audit.
Anyway, if others have looked at this as well, I'd be interested in hearing from
you!
Laurie Carpenter, CRM
Burbank, CA
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|