That link is to the January 15, 2010 six-page amendment, which is series of
minor amendments to the actual January 11, 2010 'opinion'. Does anyone have
the link to the actual January 11, 2010 Sheindlin  "87-page opinion" (as law
firm blogs are referencing it)?


This link is to a 29-page documen:
http://legalholds.typepad.com/files/pension-comm-of-montreal-v-banc-of-america---scheindlin---sdny-01-11-10.rtf



thanks,

maureen

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Carol Choksy <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> I clearly missed the discussion on the revised order. Any opinions?
>
>
>
> Here is the link:
>
>
> http://ralphlosey.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/05cv9016-january-15-2010-amend
> ing-order.pdf
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Carol
>
>
>
> Carol E.B. Choksy, Ph.D., CRM, PMP
>
>
> CEO
>
>
> IRAD Strategic Consulting, Inc.
>
> (317) 294-8329
>
>
>
> Adjunct Lecturer
>
> School of Library and Information Science
>
> Indiana University, Bloomington
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Maureen Cusack
San Francisco, CA
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]