Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:00:14 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jamie--
If your group was not involved in developing the schedule, it certainly
should. Suffice it to say, I've witnessed instances where an organization
creates a group of non-RMs to develop schedules, etc. only to have the
work tabled indefinitely or produce a disappointing end-product that then
requires the RM to fix it. Make the case to upper mgmt that your RM group
is the best and most logical resource to tackle the schedule.
<<On top of this, our newly formed records management group (my position
included) was not involved in the development of the schedule.>>
--Stephen
Stephen Cohen, Records Manager
MetLife \ Legal Affairs
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-6796
212-578-2373
[log in to unmask]
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|