RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:31:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
I usually recommend that anyone considering an ERMS selection download and
review these "standards" as they are an excellent starting point for
requirements definition. They illustrate many of the concepts, issues,
functions and metadata that a full-scale ERM needs to address. As long as
they are used as enlightening guides and references they are great.

John

****************************
John Phillips
Information Technology Decisions
www.infotechdecisions.com
865-966-9413


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Mullen, James L
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: What a "STANDARD" is and is not

Agreeing with Larry, John, and Bill to date on the subject topic, there is
one other scenario I can think of which may require selection of a DoD
certified RMA.

 

In short, if your customer is acting as an agent of the US government and
you are required to store data related to that product, you may be required
to use a DoD certified product.  All other things being equal, DoD and MoReq
assist in separating the wheat from the chaff, as it were.  They are the
only functional guidelines for RMA selection out there today in addition to
YOUR own requirements.

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Mullen, Company Records Specialist - Engineering
Spirit Aerosystems Inc.
Tech. Services & Process Config., Data & Records
P.O. Box 780008, M/C K32-02
Wichita, KS  67278
(316) 526-0069
mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 

 

 

Date:    Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:40:21 -0400

From:    "Manago, William M" <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: What a "STANDARD" is and is not

 

I agree with both Larry and John, with one minor exception.  In the case of
DoD 5015.02, the word standard was used to indicate a "standardized" list of
minimum functional features required by DoD and that must be present in the
vendor's offering and the function must also pass certification testing.
The document is often referred to by a shorter version of the long name of
the title.  The document is a standard list of requirements for DoD
agencies, it is a guideline for everyone else.

 

Bill Manago, CRM

Principal Engineering Services Architect

CA Technologies

 

Tel: Â +1-954-482-2977

Fax: +1-954-725-4518

 

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2