On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Laura Brooks
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> I think I miss the point. Wasn't the question about Symantec's Enterprise
> Vault and how well it works or fits in with what RIM seeks to accomplish?
>
that is correct, but Hugh's point is that the name "Enterprise Vault" is
misleading, and that if records managers want sit at the big table they need
to ask the hard questions. Vaults have a specific meaning in people's minds.
To most it means a place where you put your valuables, where they will be
protected from harm. now a RM would ask "so tell me how Symantec's
'Enterprise Vault' is comparable to a regular vault?"
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbytehttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]