Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:40:30 -0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Chris
I agree with previous replies about standards and guidelines. But I'd like
to add that whether you need 100% verification or sampling depends also on
the nature of the project.
If the project is to convert retrospectively some collection of records that
will not necessarily be looked at in the immediate future, then you need QA
of some sort, as advised in the other responses. But if the project
involves all the record images being looked at quickly - usually for
indexing or for some other workflow step - then a separate QA step is
probably superfluous, as any defective scanning will be noticed as a
by-product of the process.
Marc Fresko
Inforesight Limited
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Flynn [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 12 January 2011 19:24
Subject: Sampling
Hello,
I have some folks that are looking at an imaging project, using Image Now.
Any experts out there? i would love to tap your brain. They are also looking
at sampling rather than verifying every image (my recommendation is to
verify every image). Any thoughts on sampling?
Chris Flynn
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|