That's a nice succinct summary of Romano v. Steelcase (and I did not have to register to access the article). However, in CA in a case called Crispin v. Audigier, the courts found that there *is* an expectation of privacy for social media content set to a more restrictive privacy setting. (see http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202471022686&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1 or http://is.gd/qfFzbx if the long link doesn't work) 

Larry's point remains absolutely correct and relevant, I just wanted to note that there is not yet consensus about privacy expectations for social media and that at some point the Supreme Court will probably have to make the final decision about which way stands. 

Best, 

Jesse Wilkins, CRM
Director, Systems of Engagement
AIIM International
[log in to unmask] 
http://www.aiim.org  
(303) 574-0749 direct
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jessewilkins 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]