RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mariani, Carolyn" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:08:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I have been helping to update our list of active legal holds and create a list of all employees (past and present) assigned to each.  I came across several instances where an administrative assistant was included based his/her assignment to a person with the actual records in question.  I asked why, and the assistants said they didn't know since they did not have any records that would support the Hold.  When I asked the attorney who created the distribution list I was told that best practices are to include the assistants.  
This is a first for me.  Has anyone ever experienced or accepted this as a normal practice?  

Carolyn Mariani, CRM
Director, Records Management
Warner Music Group
212-275-2410
[log in to unmask]
 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2