RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Bailey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 02:18:27 -0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Check out your sources, it is all false and not the first time it has appeared
 
> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:09:49 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RAINdrip: When is destruction of records NOT destruction of records?
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> http://ow.ly/4uyTy
> 
> Don't look at the source or the subject of the story and assume this is a
> political post, my intent in providing it has NOTHING to do with politics.
> 
> This doesn't appear to be a case of inappropriate destruction of records, it
> seems ot be a case of misappropriation of records- in either event, the
> records should be returned to the State of Arkansas.
> 
> The article and image in it doesn't state if the former Governor REQUESTED
> that this take place, it only documents WHAT took place. However, as part
> of this action, copies of the State records were removed from the State
> Government's control and ownership and transferred to "a designee of his
> (former) office" and another "designee of his (former) office" also
> witnessed the destruction of the drives and network drives, which were
> mirrored and copies given to "a designee of his (former) office".
> 
> In addition, the decision to destroy drives after they were subjected to a
> seven-pass overwrite to meet the ECIO standard seems a bit absurd. If this
> is the ECIO's practice, then the drives should have been unable to be
> forensically inspected to reveal any residual content, so the unwarranted
> destruction resulted in the need to replace the hardware.
> 
> Obviously, those records which meet the definition of "the People's Records"
> for the State of Arkansas should have NEVER been removed from the custody of
> the State and should be returned. 
> 
> If under further investigation it is determined that the hardware was
> destroyed at the request of the former Governor and NOT as a part of normal
> practices of the Office of the ECIO, the State should be reimbursed for the
> cost of both labor and hardware to replace them. The same should be
> applicable to the reconstitution of the records from any mirrored drives or
> backup tapes.
> 
> Larry
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
 		 	   		  
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2