You might be assuming any old experience documentation will do for length of
position tenure.  I don't believe this will be the case.  I believe the
experience documentation will be read and properly evaluated and
qualification won't be granted without appropriate experience which assures
those with the opportunity to take the exams have had sufficient experience.
There may be some surprised applicants if they believe any experiences will
do.

I believe the board was aware of a broader range of considerations than have
been discussed or considered here in the Listserv reaction e-mails and made
a careful and value-add decision for the credential.  I will be surprised if
I were to wake up in five or ten years with a credential which can be shown
to have been diluted in any way.    

I really am glad there is so much passion on this topic regardless of the
direction of the opinion.  I think it's a healthy discussion among CRM's,
candidates, applicants and potential applicants.

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Gregg Long
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ICRM Press Release - Change to Qualification Standards

To those that have disagreed and believe that taking and passing the test
makes you "qualified" and therefore the significant lowering of the
professional experience requirements represents no problem, I put this
forth. 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]