RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:19:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> I thought this was covered by federal (FRE) and state rules of evidence,
> many of which say that a copy of an original is acceptable. Can a judge
> override these?
>

you need to look at the Best Evidence rule. Paper trumps digital, paper
trumps microform. Keep the paper you produce the paper.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/best_evidence_rule

http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/evid/evid30.htm

more can be found here http://bit.ly/oycZTp
-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2