On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> But everything I've seen on the topic the last couple of years
> indicates that courts increasingly want native format or as-used, not PDFs
> of everything.
>
From Sedona Principles Addressing Electronic Document Production
"re Priceline.Com Inc. Securities Litig., 233 F.R.D. 88, 89-91 (D. Conn.
2005) (resolving disputes over the form of preservation and production by
ordering that production be in TIFF and PDF form but that the original data
be maintained in its original native file format for the duration of the
litigation)."
http://bit.ly/zX8Bt6
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbytehttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
