RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Seibolt, Robert" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 May 2012 16:42:37 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Charlie Sodano wrote:
>>As Nancy Freeman mentioned,  pre-clinical research data can be shelved
>>and
then revived many years later.

The FDA only has a 2 year retention for pre-clinical records, after submission.  Deciding how long to keep research records is a business decision, not a regulatory requirement.  Is this also your understanding?

We are a little off topic from the original question but pre-clinical  research records is definitely a hot button. My question comes to the fact that most research organizations are 3rd party. They aren't going to know anything about when or if marketing permits are applied for or issued. They also will have no knowledge of batch expirations. I agree that it does become a business decision. It also gets to the discussion of joining the "keep everything forever" club. Does that include keeping records and information that are both electronic and paper from proprietary instruments and applications that have the lifespan of a fruit fly?

We can say it but doing it is another matter. If you say you have it, you have to find and produce it- now and forever. For raw project data 20-50 years down the road that's going to be tough sell and it's going to be a tougher sell to spend resources on keeping that data when the contract is closed and the revenue stream is long gone. It also gets interesting when organizations have bought and sold products and development rights. Which organization has rights to access to the research 20 years down the road?

At what point does that previous data become obsolete either by the passage of time, standards, media, hardware, applications, and even organizational memory? Even if you have it you are going to need to reproduce the study because someone is bound to say the old data is "extremely primitive" with "questionable results" and "archaic standards". Forty years is a long time to maintain records just to hear that snippy comment especially when you have heard it said about research records that are only FIVE years old!

Rob Seibolt, CRM
Supervisor-Records Management
816-360-5480
http://www.mriglobal.org


This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by facsimile, e-mail or phone and delete all copies of the message.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2