It's possible that DPD was actually under a legal obligation to *not*
delete those tweets -- and maybe not for two whole years, even.

That's a theory bolstered by calls placed to DPD's Public Information
Office earlier in the day, in which officers made it clear that they had no
intentions of taking down the postings in question (until they did). It's
an idea that's even more backed up by the Texas Public Information Act,
which was modernized/reworded in 2013 to include internet postings, and
also by Texas Government Code Section 552.021, which governs that "any
electronic communication created, transmitted, received, or maintained on
any device if the communication is in connection with the transaction of
official business" must be a part of public record.

http://bit.ly/29oCsTe
http://bit.ly/29oCsTe+


-- 
Peterk
Dallas, Tx
[log in to unmask]
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
“If only there were a massive entity that I were forced to fund to tell me
how I should live my life, since I’m so obviously incapable of deciding for
myself.” M. Hashimoto

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]