RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:22:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Imagine this scenario: The general counsel of a corporation learns that the
Department of Justice has set new priorities emphasizing investigations of
a specific type of corporate misconduct. Based on internal reports, she
suspects that her company is or may become a target of an investigation.

She immediately directs the company’s information technology staff to
delete email communications and a shared electronic folder that contains
evidence of this misconduct. All of these electronic files are due for
deletion pursuant to the company’s document retention policy. The general
counsel also warns employees not to speak with federal investigators about
any misconduct.

What, if any, of the general counsel’s conduct amounts to obstruction of
justice? The question is that of intent, and the answer may depend on the
statute used by prosecutors and the federal circuit where the act occurred.


http://bit.ly/2wfDEQb
http://bit.ly/2wfDEQb+


-- 
Peterk
Dallas, Tx
[log in to unmask]
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
“If only there were a massive entity that I were forced to fund to tell me
how I should live my life, since I’m so obviously incapable of deciding for
myself.” M. Hashimoto

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2