RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Julie J. Colgan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 May 2010 13:37:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Hey Bryant!  We missed you at MER - maybe next year?

Anyway, the reason for it being included in this instance is because  
the conference is specifically focused on the management of electronic  
records.  Paper is out of scope (mostly).

IMO, the distinction is still quite vaid in general too.  Managing  
paper records is different than managing their electronic brethren.   
Retention schedules are media neutral, but that doesn't mean media can  
be ignored.  Each have traits and characteristics that need to be  
dealt with.  PLUS, paper is still alive and well, so we can't simply  
just ignore it (which I'm not saying you were implying).

Now, if you want to pose that same question with regard to  
Discovery ... I'm right there with you!

Julie

[log in to unmask]

Sent from my iPhone

On May 19, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Bryant Duhon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> As I was noticing the occasional tweets from the MER conference, I  
> started
> wondering -- why is the "electronic" needed in between "managing" and
> "records"? (This isn't a crack at Bob Cohasset or the conference  
> itself,
> which I've always wanted to attend.)
>
> We're a good 15 years into the realization that electronic documents,
> emails, blogs, maybe even Tweets are all records. As I've learned  
> over the
> years (from many of you in fact), the content makes the record a  
> record. The
> container is (somewhat) irrelevant.
>
> And, yeah, we're guilty of it too. AIIM has both the "Electronic" RM
> programs and the Electronic Records Management community as well
> (www.ermcommunity.org).
>
> So why is that "Electronic" still needed?
>
> Is it just a habit now or is there still a mindset that the only real
> records are ones you can put your hands on, not bits and bytes  
> accessible by
> fingers on a keyboard?
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already  
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body  
> of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2