I think Wayne asks two vitally important questions:

"Before the advent of electronic records, was all paper discoverable?  If
so, what was done about managing documents that were not declared as
records?"

In the electronic records age, are we at risk of losing control of our
managing responsibilities by focusing too keenly on different versions of
the same electronic records?   Shouldn't we be involved to ensure that the
"final" record is managed pro-actively rather than passively accept the
record for disposition at the end of its "lifecycle".  I'm still confused.


David Kay


On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Wayne Hoff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> David Kay asks (Re: "Electronic" Records Management):
> "Is everything considered an electronic record?"
>
> A critical question for our day.  Since all ESI is discoverable, should it
> not all
> fall within a records mgmt program - or at least an information mgmt
> program?
>
> Before the advent of electronic records, was all paper discoverable?  If
> so,
> what was done about managing documents that were not declared as records?
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]