RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:06:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
lIf any of the 5 retention policy factors change, an org should look at
all the policies and see which ones will be affected.  In this case, it
is very likely that many retentions can be shortened based on not having
the regulations.  Others can always say this or that, traditionally,
whatever, big deal.  Follow the retention policy matrix and document the
change in policy and why, and the org is covered.

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 08/05/05 08:52AM >>>
Of course, in the retention process one will ask, what is the standard
business practice for most utilities when it comes to these record
types -
and someone will pull out that dog-eared copy of the 1972 version of
Title
18 and say, "well traditionally..."

The regs may be gone, but the expectation will still be there and the
opposing side will claim any changes you made, were to ditch your
smoking
guns.
<snip>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2