Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:50:18 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Depends on the size and management style of the organisation. One place I
worked had a pretty flat structure, 400 staff. I was a level 3 (CEO, my
boss, then me). The HR manager was also level 3, as was the CIO. Where I
am now, I'm a level 4 (CEO, Divisional GM, my boss, me). The HR and IT
managers are level 3. In both cases, considering nature of
responsibilities vs size of organisation, I consider the level I am / was
at quite appropriate.
A couple of years ago I did a quick quiz on this topic on the Australian
(RMAA) listserv, and this pattern held true across about 20 responses.
Cheers
Glenn
Glenn Sanders MRMA
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
Australia
These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately via return e-mail and then delete the original e-mail. EnergyAustralia has collected your business contact details for dealing with you in your business capacity. More information about how we handle your personal information, including your right of access is contained at http://www.energy.com.au.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|