RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:15:28 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
--- Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>But many organizations work from the premise that if they show a
salary range of X to Y, there will be a surprising number of people who
are currently paid at just less than Y who apply for the position. 

>No doubt there are always going to be people with requirements that
fit 
the given range, stated or not.

Just to clarify my point... since most organizations have no real way
to verify an applicant's salary, I would suggest that when a salary
range is reported as X to Y, many candidates will adjust their reported
current salary to meet what they expect to be paid (at a minimum) in
the new job... which will often be *amazingly* just short of Y. I
suspect that is a bigger reason for not stating salary range in most
job ads. 

Either way, there is always a bit of a game to be played when you're
asked the dreaded "what are your compensation expectations?" question.
It sometimes makes or breaks the deal. And you either find out you
overvalued yourself of undervalued yourself. But it is part of the
game.


Patrick Cunningham, CRM
[log in to unmask]

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2