I agree with what John has written below. The list needs to focus upon the
facts and discuss the issue in a professional manner. We need to leave the
political partisanship at the door and discuss this as if we were facing the
same problem within our organizations. Strip away the names and the
political identity and think of this as if it was a ICRM Part VI case study.
for example
"Governor Jones has two personal internet email accounts that are
occasionally used for government business. The state does not have a clear
cut policy concerning such use nor a technical method for capturing the
emails.  you as the state records manager must as part of your duties draft
a new policy statement that takes into account future communication
technology as well as identifying tools or methods that can be used to
capture these type of emails.""

now have at it.

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:34 PM, John Phillips
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>
> Claims by one group or another can be found on any version of the evening
> news, where there is at least some attempt to validate those claims. I
> suggest that we focus on substantive opinion, validated facts, and
> professional issues debate, or I will ignore threads like this.
>

-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]