RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
pakurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:14:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
  Sent to you by pakurilecz via Google Reader: E-mail Archive
Organization and Search via Wright's Legal Beagle by Ben Wright on
9/17/08 Privileged Electronic RecordsE-discovery risk: the party
turning over documents may mistakenly hand its adversary some documents
that should be protected by attorney-client privilege (that is,
confidentiality because they are communications between an attorney and
a client). E-discovery often involves so many records that privileged
ones might divulged inadvertently.

In answer to this risk, Congress is adopting new Federal Rule of
Evidence 502. Basically the new Rule says that if a litigant mistakenly
divulges a privileged record, she can still prevent her adversary from
using it – provided she had taken reasonable steps at the beginning to
prevent the release. Another way to say it: before delivering
e-discovery documents, a party should execute a reasonable search
through them to screen out any that contain protected attorney-client
material.

That kind of screening can be hard to do. In Victor Stanley, Inc. v.
Creative Pipe, Inc., 250 F.R.D. 251 (D. Md. 2008), the defendant did
search to filter for attorney-client material before disclosing
voluminous e-discovery documents to the plaintiff. However, the filter
was imperfect, and the plaintiff came to possess 165 privileged records.

The defendant contended those 165 documents should remain protected
(i.e., the plaintiff should return them and be barred from using them),
but the court disagreed. The court said for those 165 items the
defendant had "waived" the privilege. As a rationale for its decision,
the court . . . Continue Reading
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Wright's Legal Beagle using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

ATOM RSS1 RSS2