RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Barnard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:44:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Peter posted a thoughtful reply to Mr. Wright's blog.  Mr. Wright responded last night:  

"The content-determined standard for records retention does not seem to work for e-mail. E-mail is so voluminous, and it mixes so many kinds of content, that it is impratical to set a content-based retention period for it."
He then said, "What do you (and others) think?"

I can't believe someone who is supposedly an expert on e-mail would say that!  I'll leave it to those of you smarter than I to reply appropriately!  

Tim Barnard
[log in to unmask] 


http://legal-beagle.typepad.com/wrights_legal_beagle/2008/09/medical-and-education-record-retention-and-purge-policy.html 

http://shrinkster.com/128f

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:50 PM, pakurilecz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> note if you disagree with anything or agree with anything be sure to
> leave a comment at the blogsite
>
> How long should an enterprise retain e-data? What's a smart policy on
> e-record destruction? Hear how East Carolina University answered the
> questions for e-mail, medical records and security videos.


      

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2