RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mrozak, Suzanne" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:35:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
Thanks to all who have responded. This has all been very helpful so far.

Just an FYI, an added complication for us is that we do not have a records retention schedule or policy in place yet, although we are working on both at the moment. IT, however, does not intend to wait for us to catch up before they roll out their "solution."

Comments? Advice?

Cheers
Suzanne

Suzanne Mrozak | Director | Global Information and Records Management
Genzyme Corporation | 500 Kendall Street Cambridge, MA 02142 | 617-768-6549
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin Tisdel
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 1:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Email archiving retention question

I recently initiated an email archiving/e-discovery project with IS.  We 
reviewed  4 or 5 vendors products.  When we narrowed our list down to two 
vendors they demonstrated their products.  Both had a feature whereby you 
could set retention periods based on user profiles or folders.  While 
administratively challenging we were going to set up the following 
process:
1.  The emails would be archived after 60 days.
2.  Employees would identify emails as either business records or 
non-records
3.  Employees would move the business records to folders with specific 
retention series
4.  After 90 days any email not moved to a records retention folder would 
be deleted.
5.  The folders would automatically process the emails based on the 
folders retention period.
6.  The e-discovery tool would allow us to search and put individual 
emails on hold, thus stopping us from inadvertently destroying records.

Both vendors stated their system could do it this way.

The project is currently on hold.

 
Kevin Tisdel 
Director of Corporate Compliance
Shaw Industries Group, Inc.




"Mrozak, Suzanne" <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
02/13/2009 10:25 AM
Please respond to
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Email archiving retention question






Greeting to all from Cambridge, MA, where the snow is finally melting 
:-)....



**********************************************************
Privileged and/or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or are not responsible for delivery of this message to that person) , you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply e-mail.
If you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind, please advise the sender.
Shaw Industries does not provide or endorse any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the company  or its subsidiaries.
**********************************************************

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2