Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:36:42 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
With all the changes to processing, could all these different virtual
elements create problems with enforcing any level of retention
scheduling.
For example, virtual computing spread computing around to various
servers without a real defined directory. This file on that server
at this time and so on. Now Cloud computing put this even more
remote. So you go along removing and destroying documents at the end
of their life cycle. But somewhere Servers were pulled of line due
to maintenance issues and sits there idle. It misses it de-
duplication cycle and then a subpoena comes along and various servers
are sitting out there, off line and holding documents that are past
retention schedule but were never destructed.
Computer systems are not designed to deal with retention schedules
and they create and store documents in many locations that are not
thought of when management cycles are reviewed.
Un less someone creates a new form of records management software
that can search out all these items. But if a server if offline for
repair when this happens, it just is missed.
Am I wrong?
Hugh Smith
FIRELOCK Fireproof Modular Vaults
[log in to unmask]
(610) 756-4440 Fax (610) 756-4134
WWW.FIRELOCK.COM
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|