Hi Mary!  Happy Friday from snowy Denver :-)  We use Records Liaison as
the dept contact designation.

 
Sheri Nystedt, CRM
[log in to unmask] 

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Hilliard, Mary
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Preferred terms

Happy Friday to all and merry March madness (or sadness as the case may
be),

Austin, Texas is alive with the sounds of music during SXSW and whooping
it up at the rodeo to keep our spirits up (see above).

I need to poll my esteemed list servers on a couple of terminology
issues.  I am in the final throes of editing new policy documents to
present to the RIM steering committee and wrestling with this type of
detail.

To wit:

What is correct usage of Record Series vs. Records Series?  I think that
the first is the singular and the latter is the plural referring the
"group of related records.....etc.", but the ARMA Glossary only defines
the term Records Series.

In the post-paper world of predominantly electronic records management,
I don't want to use the term Records Coordinator because of the
association with managing paper files.  I considered using Records
Champion, but that term doesn't actually reflect the role, so now I am
considering using Records Liaison.  Am interested to hear other thoughts
and other terms if they have been useful.

Thanks to all,
Mary Hilliard, CRM

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]