RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Wyton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:03:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
[cid:image002.gif@01CAE09A.91CAE8A0]
My department is currently going through a "process improvement" exercise.      One of the possible "improvements"  centers around the box number process.      Here is our current situation:     when the RM department  issues empty archive boxes, we attached a unique 6 digit bar coded label.    When the box goes to our offsite storage provider for the first time, we also attach their unique bar coded label.    Both numbers are entered into our RM software and cross referenced.
It has been suggested that we eliminate our own label and work only with the storage vendors number.
For those of you in similar positions or who have been in this position at some point, can you  provide me with some pros/cons to our proposed "improvement"?       I have already expressed my own opinion to the process team however it has been deemed that I am too close to the process and possibly "can't see the forest for the trees".
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Barb



Barbara Wyton
Records Management Specialist
GlaxoSmithKline (Canada)
905-819-7050 (direct)
905-819-3099 (fax)


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2