On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  There should be room for a reassessment based on current value.
>
>
and if a retention schedule is properly written records series that may have
items of archival/historical value will be removed prior to destruction. For
example the vast majority of invoices that are received by an organization
will not have long term historical value to the organization unless one is
able to review the series prior to destruction.

remember that a  business archive is there to document the history and
processes of an organization. There is no reason why one wouldn't sample
items from records series that have short term value in order to show the
process


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]