RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:04:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Wayne Hoff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> Larry, what makes 'classify' objectionable?
>

"Classify" has a specific meaning in the federal sector. typically means is
an item top secret, secret, whatever.  thus if you use the term 'classify'
when talking with someone from a sector that "classifies" records for
accessibility they may not know you mean 'categorize'

using categorize avoids any confusion. just like the IT world starting to
use the term "archive" for storage when RMs and archivists know that
"archive" means a place for items of long term historical value to an
organization.

for the projects I'm on I have generally have to do a terminology level-set
to make sure project team members understand what various terms mean.
otherwise misconceptions can take place.


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2