Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:46:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<But we still need to keep insurance contracts prior to 1994 for 30 years.
Most retention schedule I've worked with only mention that the 3 year rule applies for records created or received after January 1st 1994. And say nothing more. So, for these records, we still need to use the older retention schedule (to one with the 30 year rule).>
Dominic:
It makes excellent sense in English and is a good example. In the water utility industry we encountered a similar example with something called the "Information Collection Rule" that was only in existence for a few years, but impacted records for several years after it expired. We worded the retention schedule description for the records series to include one retention for ICR reports submitted to the EPA pre-2001 and another retention for reports submitted to the EPA after 2001 (when the ICR program ended and the records retention was changed in the Federal Code of Regulations.)
Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|