RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:48:53 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Nancy Ur asked: 

"I'm wondering if you'd share your 
handling of contract clauses that speak to the disposition of records
upon 
contract expiration, for records either created or received by contract
vendors 
on behalf of your company.  I'd like to know if anyone requires the
vendor to  
return the records to your company, whereby the records are incorporated

into your RRS. Your comments are much appreciated!"

I think this is an area ripe for improvement.  If you do business with
the US Government, you're required to flow down to subcontractors all
requirements (including those for records maintenance and retention)
that you are held responsible for by our friends in Washington, DC.  If
you do not, then you are liable for any problems.  

I strongly believe that anyone who subcontracts goods and services needs
to evaluate whether records will be created as part of that subcontract
and, if so, spell out in the contract's terms & conditions what those
obligations are.  

However, during my stint in aerospace I ran into a lot of resistance
from management to doing this.  Much of the resistance was, I believe,
traceable to the fact that these subcontracts were already in existence
(and no one wanted to risk reopening negotiations).

From a records perspective, it should be pretty clear cut: Evaluate your
organization's obligations regarding records for outsourced good and
services.  Establish a separate Records clause in the terms & conditions
that spells out these requirements and how the subcontractor needs to
support them.

Decisions to NOT do this would be based on risk management assessments.

One woman's opinion, anyway.

Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
Director of Business Intake and Records
333 South Hope Street
43rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1422
[log in to unmask]
Direct: 213.617.5417
Fax: 213.443.2703


Circular 230 Notice: In accordance with Treasury Regulations we notify you that any tax advice given herein (or in any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein (or in any attachments).
 
Attention: This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
http://www.sheppardmullin.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2