RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:08:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (95 lines)
Good day all and happy New Year.

In November I spoke at the ARMA conference on our case study for email 
management.  I provided eight different solutions that we considered of 
which two were the "big bucket" approach and "cloud computing" approach. 
In reviewing the comments that attendee's had provided, two people 
suggested in their written comments that I misrepresented both of these 
approaches.  As I want to better understand both of these better, I would 
like your input on what I wrote and said: 

Big Bucket
Advantages
Easy for users to understand.  
Users determine which bucket to put records in. 
Records are somewhat managed.
Some retention assigned
Timesaver 
Disadvantages
Poor records classification.
Often results in longer retention periods.
Investment in Content Management System not leveraged
Event driven retention not possible

I mentioned that the big bucket approach often works best in a large 
organization with hundreds of records series.  In a smaller working 
environment such as my organization with 55 main record series, this may 
not be required.

Cloud Computing
Advantages
Low, predictable costs
Managed as a service, unlimited space.
Web based, accessible by all 
Robust feature sets
Rapid deployment
No in-house IT support
Disadvantages
Security ? outside the firewall
Loss of management control
Ownership
Customer service relations may suffer
Service Level Agreement (SLA)

I mentioned that the quality of the service was often based upon the level 
of the service agreement.  A non-comprehensive agreement would result in 
poorer service and would not look after the customers needs.  In other 
words, do your homework on the agreement and you won't get burned and 
you'll protect your organization.

I'd appreciate any and all comments.  If I have misrepresented these, I 
would like to know.  As well, if you agree with me, I'd like to hear from 
you also.  If you would re-write them, then please do.

Thanks, 

John Annunziello, CRM, ermm
Manager, Records and Information 
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
[log in to unmask]

"Information is a corporate, strategic asset that needs to be managed"










"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT WHEN DECIDING TO PRINT THIS MESSAGE*



Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:

The information contained in this communication including any attachments 
may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named 
above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution,disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
resend this communication to the sender and delete it permanently from 
your computer system.

Thank you."



List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2