very interesting glossary.

how were the definitions developed? Considering that ISO 15489 already has
an internationally recognized definition why not use that instead of what is
in your glossary?

"1. A documented account of data and/or information that represents or helps
describe the state of an item or object at one or more specific points in
time, often stored and indexed in some formal manner for later retrieval,
that helps address the needs and issues associated with accounting,
auditing, compliance, litigation or knowledge management in general."

Peterk

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Frank Guerino <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>
> In our own glossary, we have a definition for, both,
>
> - a generic "Record"
> (http://www.if4it.com/SYNTHESIZED/GLOSSARY/R/Record.html),
> - and correlating generic discipline called "Records Management"
> (
> http://www.if4it.com/SYNTHESIZED/DISCIPLINES/Records_Management_Home_Page.
> html<http://www.if4it.com/SYNTHESIZED/DISCIPLINES/Records_Management_Home_Page.%0Ahtml>)
> that explicitly deals with the management of such a noun.
>
> I'm wondering if there's a requirement to clearly define a Public Record
> vs. a Private Record and create correlating disciplines labeled "Public
> Records management" and "Private Records Management," respectively, which
> would act as sub-disciplines to the generic Records Management discipline.
>
>


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]