RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 May 2013 12:59:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Minor point of correction regarding their proprietary natures: Neither is
completely proprietary. TIFF6 has not been updated since 1992 and portions
of it were standardized by CCITT/ITU around the same time period (though I
could not find a specific cite).

PDF is in fact an ISO standard, ISO 32000-1:2008 (
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=51502, reconfirmed
just last month). There are a number of other ISO PDF-related standards
like PDF/A (ISO 19005-1/2/3), PDF/X (ISO 24517, engineering drawings), and
others in development.

Full disclosure: I work for AIIM and AIIM is intimately involved with the
PDF standardization efforts I mentioned, to the point that we may be
leading the ANSI/ISO efforts for it (though I'm not the standards guy so
blame me if I got that wrong).

Regards,

Jesse Wilkins, CIP, CRM
Director, AIIM
[log in to unmask]


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Linda Buss <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > I am curious about the pros and cons for saving scanned images in tif vs.
> > pdf.  Does a nyone want to venture an opinion?
> >
> > Linda Buss, MA, CRM
> >
> >
> Lots of great published research and papers on this that will help you
> decide what works better for you:
>
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=which+is+better+TIFF+vs+PDF
>
> One of the things to keep in mind is that although these are BOTH
> 'proprietary' formats, Adobe has placed a copy of the PDF format in escrow
> for a fixed time, in part to address the issues around the use of PDF/A.
> Another chief consideration is the resultant file sizes of the scanned
> images.  TIFF files are also much larger than PDFs, so the storage
> requirements and ability to communicate files can at times be a problem.
>
> If you're storing textual documents, or combined simple 2 dimensional
> images and text, PDF is a pretty universally accepted way to go.  With more
> complex files and 3D images or line drawings, etc many prefer TIFF and
> scans imaged at a higher resolution.  Again, your files will be larger, but
> the image clarity may be more important with these for future use.
>
> Another issue is if the images are going to be sent somewhere like NARA- at
> this point, PDF/A is the preferred format for acceptance of imaged files,
> but that doesn't mean they WON'T accept anything else- you need to check
> with the Agency you're working with or NARA to determine what the
> requirements are on that.
>
> Larry
> [log in to unmask]
>
> --
> *Lawrence J. Medina
> Danville, CA
> RIM Professional since 1972*
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Regards,

Jesse Wilkins
[log in to unmask]
blog: http://informata.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jessewilkins

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2