Hi Ginny,
This is a shocker!
As Niri Shan, at Taylor Wessing, says " it could raise interesting legal
implications..."

I suspect that we mostly expect this "established" copying technology to be
more robust; and now it looks like this problem is not as contained as
Xerox first thought.

So my question to the list is this: *What are the Records Management
implications ?*
e.g. When a physical record conflicts with a digital record.

I would be interested in your views and any experience in this area.

Greg Stewart
Oyster IMS, New Loom House, 101 Back Church Lane, London E1 1LU
e: [log in to unmask]
Twitter: @oysterims
*Information Management People, Process and Technology*

regards
Greg
07887 492 390


On 6 August 2013 20:55, Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Here's a new twist!
>
> Confused Xerox copiers rewrite documents, expert finds
> Photocopiers made by Xerox are changing numbers on documents, a German
> computer scientist has discovered.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23588202
>
>
> Ginny Jones
> (Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
> Records Manager
> Information Technology Division
> Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
> Newport News, VA
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]