It looks like Proposition 42 passed.

(Apologies for leaving the original message, below, but I wanted it clear to what I was referring.)

Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of PeterK
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Californians to vote on cost of public records

Californians to vote on cost of public records

SAN DIEGO (AP) — Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature had just sealed a
$96.3 billion state budget last year when an outcry erupted over a provision that allowed local governments to deny requests for public documents because the state wouldn’t reimburse them.

They restored funding and now support a ballot measure that aims to make sure the episode is never repeated.

Proposition 42 would amend the state constitution to require cities, counties, school districts and other local agencies to comply with state laws to make documents available and open their meetings to the public.
They also would be required to cover the costs for doing so.


http://bit.ly/T0x24h

Source: http://www.mantecabulletin.com/section/140/article/105538/
See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/T0x24h+ Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]