Larry reread it again. The House wouldn't do the firing the agencies would. On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:25 PM, PeterK <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > > > A House committee on Thursday approved measures that would require > federal > > agencies to preserve instant messages and fire workers who destroy > records > > — concerns that have come to light in the ongoing IRS > > > This is rich... the House is gonna "fire workers who destroy records". > > How about we ask those same House members to write down the definition of a > record in the Federal arena? > -- Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP [log in to unmask] Dallas, Texas Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org http://twitter.com/RAINbyte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/ http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archives-in-the-news http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/ http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz #*CantbeworsethanPeterk* <https://twitter.com/hashtag/CantbeworsethanPeterk?src=hash> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. mailto:[log in to unmask]
