One needs to review the outcome of the contract that was signed by BART. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/BART-unions-clash-again-over-contract-error-4987159.php
Personally I am in the first camp as convenience copies can come back to bite you, more that has to be managed and creates additional review during discovery.  With that said I have talked to a number of lawyers that fall on both sides with the preponderance in the second camp.   One would think we have this sorted out by now.

Cheers.


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged and protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your computer system. Thank you.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]