RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:55:41 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Seibolt, Robert <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> We do onsite audits every two years. I use the NARA CFR standard as a
> guide (36 CFR Part 1228 Subpart K). You can have performance levels for
> deliveries and notifications regarding things such as sales and
> acquisitions of providers in your agreements. I use the "spirit of the CFR"
> to cover basics such as security, organization(people and the facility
> itself- are there too many shelving units, is the processing area a mess
> etc.), access, pest control, fire control, disaster planning, training of
> employees, procedures and SOPs, and environmental controls.
>
>
Robert-

Just an FYI, the CFR has been revised a few times since that was the
correct reference.  There was a major re-write in 2009 that moved "the
artist formerly known as" Part 1228 Subpart K, to Part 1234.  And bits and
pieces of the new Part were changed and rather than say it was weakened,
let's just say it was "softened".  You can find Part 1234 here:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title36-vol3/pdf/CFR-2011-title36-vol3-part1234.pdf

It's still designed to address "establishment, maintenance and operation of
record centers" either Federally owned and operated, by NARA, another
Agency, or Contractor operated.... and it also covers use of commercial
facilities when they are storing Federal records.

Hugh's suggestion of also reviewing NFPA232 is spot on.  The caveat of
"Federal" doesn't apply there... so it's a broader scope of coverage.  But
sadly, the Standard has weakened from the 2007 version, which had really
clear guidance that was easy to "audit" against.

Larry

-- 
Larry
[log in to unmask]



*----Lawrence J. MedinaDanville, CARIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2