RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:41:27 -0500
Reply-To:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Help, need ammunition to defeat the worst possible public records legislation EVER proposed!
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:31:46 -0600, Gary Vocks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I guess the only thing that bothers me about the amendment is that seems to
> be about replacing microfilm.

in my first read through I got the same impression, that who ever
wanted this change in the law did not want to use microfilm.

this legislation is a classic example for Bismarck's statement about
sausage and legislation

pak

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2