RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Sherri Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 May 2005 13:20:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
No David, I don't believe that would be the end of the story.  I think you
would file a claim with your insurance carrier to have your car replaced.
Much the same as you would have done if your car had been self parked and
not valet parked.

Sherri Taylor

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gaynon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 11:41 AM
Subject: Lost record boxes


> I have always found the question of liability and what you are entitiled
> to if your storage vendor is unable to locate one of your boxes to be an
> fascinating question.  Typically contracts will limit their liability to
> some fixed value per box.
>
> But think of it in another way.  Suppose you park your car at the airport
> using valet parking.  Further suppose that when you present your ticket to
> get your car back they tell you that unfortunately they are unable to
> locate it.  When you raise a stink they point out to the small print on
> the back of your claim ticket that indicates that they are not liable for
> any loss or damage to your car.  Would that really be end of the story.
>
> I hope not.
>
> Dave Gaynon
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2