On 12/30/05, Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Note in the reference below that the judge actually penalized the law
> firm on their fee because they chose to print the electronic records to
> paper.
>
> > The Cricket Technologies case index has been updated.
> > Log in here: http://igdev.crickettechnologies.com/case_studies/search
> > to search the case index or change your user preferences.
Here is another online source about e-discovery, you can even sign up
for email updates from them
http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
--
Peter Kurilecz
Richmond, Va
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance