RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date:
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:00:05 -0700
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Okay, so I can sorta understand the intent of this concept and why they're
looking into it, but isn't this akin to scheduling e-mail as a record
series???

Businesses presently establish retention periods based on a combination of:

 laws, regulations and statutes
 business needs that may exceed those
 any potential historic, intrinsic or enduring value

But if this gets through the mill under the auspices of "protecting children
from pornographers and exploitation" and "keeping Americans safe from
terrorists", how will the legislation read to assign a retention period, and
what will the basis be, because it certainly won't be based on content.


http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/04/gonzales-pushes-data-retention-to-help.php

http://news.com.com/ISP+snooping+gaining+support/2100-1028_3-6061187.html?tag=nl


--
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2