RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:45:44 -0400
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
I could be wrong but:
This appears to be retention based on regulation. It seems there is a desire
for an extension to the time limit currently in the Electronic Communication
Transactional Records Act (90 days). The article cites the EU as requiring
retention for 6 to 24 months.
The references to porno or terrorism would be the current reason for the
increased minimum retention period but would not be the basis for the
retention - user records of Internet service providers would be the basis.
Right now, the retention is necessary "if the government requests the ISP to
keep the records." But it may be that they are considering making this a
blanket requirement?
Pat
_________________________
Patricia C. Franks, Ph.D., CRM



-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf
Of Larry Medina
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] RAINdrip: "Internet" Data Retention Regulations being
investigated by Federal Govt

Okay, so I can sorta understand the intent of this concept and why they're
looking into it, but isn't this akin to scheduling e-mail as a record
series???

Businesses presently establish retention periods based on a combination of:

 laws, regulations and statutes
 business needs that may exceed those
 any potential historic, intrinsic or enduring value

But if this gets through the mill under the auspices of "protecting children
from pornographers and exploitation" and "keeping Americans safe from
terrorists", how will the legislation read to assign a retention period, and
what will the basis be, because it certainly won't be based on content.


http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/04/gonzales-pushes-data-retention
-to-help.php

http://news.com.com/ISP+snooping+gaining+support/2100-1028_3-6061187.html?ta
g=nl


--
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2