RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Carolyn Heald <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 May 2006 10:21:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Richard,

As a starter, look at Vicki Lemieux's recent book, available at the ARMA
bookstore.

http://www.arma.org/bookstore/productdetail2.cfm?ProductID=1470

___________________________________
Carolyn Heald
Information Policy Adviser
Archives of Ontario
Tel:  416-327-1588
Fax:  416-327-1999
Email:  [log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
Website:  www.archives.gov.on.ca <http://www.archives.gov.on.ca> 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Davis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: May 12, 2006 10:14 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Definition of records-based risk


I have been asked by our enterprise-wide Records Management Committee (made
up
of high-level directors from finance, legal, IT, Records Management,
Archives,
etc.) to help come up with a good definition of risk associated with record
keeping.  They would like a definition that could be applied over the entire
organization (departments dealing with finance, HR, legal, IT, publications,
real estate, investments, etc.)  They will then define a criteria for
assessing
risk and then begin to apply this criteria to all record groups.  This is an
effort by the committee to help us as an organization focus our energies,
prioritize our efforts, and deal with records that have the most risk to the
organization first.  I've got some ideas but would like to see what some of
the
RM community thinks.
 
Does anyone have a good definition of risk.  Can a definition be applied
globally or are there different types of risk?
 
Thanks for any insight.
 
 
 
 
Richard H. Davis
Manager, Records and Information Management
Church History Department
801-240-3673
[log in to unmask]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

 
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the
 intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
 privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
 disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
 intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
 and destroy all copies of the original message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2