Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:40:18 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I just couldn't let this one go.
Larry wrote:
"Even this needs to be considered carefully. Folks need to remember
what
DOD5015.2 is and is not... it was developed by the Department of Defense
in sort of a vacuum, so to cal it a "Standard" or a "certification" is a
little bit of a misnomer. It CERTAINLY ISN'T a Standard in ISO, ANSI,
AIIM or ARMA terms... wasn't developed by a balanced body of
participants across the spectrum of industries and doesn't represent a
consensus view."
Actually this was not developed by just DOD personnel. There were many
"task forces" involved in the development of the standard. One task
force I was involved in was DOD personnel from all branches of the
military. There were other task forces made up of industry
representatives. There were participants from private companies as well
as academia. While it is true that the standard was developed for DOD,
what is not true is this statement "wasn't developed by a balanced body
of participants across the spectrum of industries".
Judy K. Tyler, CRM
Records Management Officer
Information Management Division
Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center
Fort Hood, TX 76544
(254) 288-8009
DSN 738-8009
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|