RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:28:25 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>
> My questions:
> 1. Did I describe the QC process and the intent of the QC Log correctly?
> 2. Am I correct in thinking that scanned records really need to have a
> documented QC process? If so, what can I use to convince them?
>

check out this link
Electronic imaging—Information stored electronically—Recommendations for
trustworthiness and reliability
http://shrinkster.com/11hb




-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2